食品新闻中心
News
行业动态 您的位置: 首页 > 新闻中心 > 行业动态
亚搏官网app登录-广州恒大和英超顶级球队的差距有多大?
发布人: 薇草食品 来源: 薇草食品公司 发布时间: 2021-01-06 07:06:01

The first stage of the league finally ended smoothly. The basic matchups and results were almost the same as the previous predictions (see: "Who will Hengda play first?"). The first opponent of Guangzhou Evergrande was finally determined as Hebei. Huaxia Fortune has also analyzed the basic situation of this opponent before (see "[Hengda 1:2 Suning] I have seen the stubbornness in front of me, then look at the distance"), at this time, it is finally no longer Being trapped by a intensive game in 4 days, I can do some relatively interesting things.

联赛的第一阶段终于顺利结束。基本的比赛和结果与之前的预测几乎相同(请参阅:“恒大先打谁?”)。最终,广州恒大的第一个对手被确定为河北。华夏财富之前也曾分析过该对手的基本情况(请参阅“ [恒大1:2苏宁]我已经看到我面前的固执,然后再看远方”),这时,终于不再存在在4天的时间里,我被密集的游戏困住了,我可以做一些相对有趣的事情。

Putting aside other data, just looking at the final effects of both offensive and defensive ends-shooting and scoring, we can probably see that as a team with a high ball possession rate, it is inconsistent in strategic offense and defense. , The effect is also very different.

撇开其他数据,仅查看进攻端和防守端射门和得分的最终效果,我们很可能会发现,作为一支拥有高控球率的球队,这在战略进攻和防守方面是不一致的。 ,效果也有很大不同。

First of all, from the point of view of shooting data, Evergrande in 2018, like Manchester City in 2019, has a super high number of shots per game (18-20 times per game), and Evergrande in 2019 is closer to Liverpool in 2019 (field The average number of shots is about 15.5), while the number of shots of Guangzhou Evergrande in 2020 will be further reduced, only averaging 13.1 times per game.

首先,从射击数据的角度来看,2018年的恒大与2019年的曼城一样,每场比赛都有超高的命中率(每场18-20次),而2019年的恒大更接近利物浦。 2019年(场均出手数约为15.5次),而2020年广州恒大的出手数将进一步减少,平均每场仅13.1次。

From the point of view of the goal data, the same 2018 Guangzhou Evergrande and 2019 Manchester City have great similarities, both can give an average of 2.7 goals per game. In the 2019/2020 season, Guangzhou Evergrande is closer to Liverpool in 2019, averaging around 2.2 goals per game.

从进球数据来看,相同的2018年广州恒大和2019年曼彻斯特城有很大的相似之处,两者平均每场比赛都能打入2.7个进球。在2019/2020赛季,广州恒大在2019年更接近利物浦,平均每场比赛有2.2个进球。

From the perspective of shots and conceded, the number of goals shot per game is extremely low for both Liverpool and Manchester City. Manchester City, which pursues the ultimate in possession, is even more terrifying, averaging only 7.4 shot opportunities per game. At this point, Guangzhou Evergrande clearly has a huge gap. In the past three years, Guangzhou Evergrande has given opponents about 12 shots per game, almost twice that of Manchester City.

从投篮和失球的角度来看,利物浦和曼城每场比赛的进球数非常少。追求终极控球权的曼城更加恐怖,平均每场只有7.4次出手机会。至此,广州恒大显然存在巨大差距。在过去的三年中,广州恒大每场比赛给对手约12次射门,几乎是曼城的两倍。

From the perspective of offensive efficiency data, the overall goal rate, except for this year’s Guangzhou Evergrande, which has maintained a relatively high level, is basically at a relatively normal level in the 2018/2019 season (a goal rate of about 15%). Liverpool, which is aggressive and fast, has a better goal rate than Manchester City, which has a slow penetration.

从进攻效率数据的角度来看,除了今年较高水平的广州恒大之外,整体目标率在2018/2019赛季基本处于相对正常的水平(目标率约为15%) 。利物浦具有攻击性和快速性,比曼彻斯特城的射门速度慢。

In terms of the efficiency of different offensive methods, Guangzhou Evergrande's positional warfare is good, but the counterattack ability is very hip. From the perspective of the Premier League duo, Manchester City's counterattack efficiency is almost the same as that of positional warfare. It does not show the advantage of grasping the opponent's defensive foothold. They habitually pursue control of the ball, and often delay the counterattack due to cross-passing. Fighter. Liverpool has a 42.86% counterattack scoring rate.

在不同进攻方式的效率上,广州恒大的阵地战很好,但反击能力非常强。从英超二人组的角度来看,曼城的反击效率几乎与阵地战相同。它没有显示出抓住对手的防守立足点的优势。他们习惯于控制球,并经常由于传球而延误反击。战斗机。利物浦的反击得分率为42.86%。

Some people say that the ability to counterattack must depend on having a strong forward and fast horse. In fact, this is incorrect. The fast offensive ability can depend on the individual dribbling in a wide space, of course, can also rely on efficient and fast passing and running to achieve, and Liverpool is precisely this strong player.

有人说,反击的能力必须取决于强大的前锋和快马。实际上,这是不正确的。快速的进攻能力可以取决于个人在广阔空间中的盘带,当然也可以依靠高效,快速的传球和奔跑来实现,而利物浦恰恰是这个强大的球员。

The result of the differences in the characteristics of the three teams is that in the end, the three teams have obvious differences in t亚搏体育app网页he choice of offensive methods and the final gain.

三支球队特点差异的结果是,最终,三支球队在进攻方式和最终收益的选择上有着明显的差异。

Liverpool rely on positional attacks, but because of his sharp and fast attack, they also have a strong counterattack ability, and they contribute a lot to the counterattack. Regardless of Guangzhou Evergrande or Manchester City, it can basically be said that they rely more on positional attacks.

利物浦依靠位置进攻,但由于他的锋利而快速的进攻,他们也具有很强的反击能力,并且为反击做出了很大贡献。无论是广州恒大还是曼城,基本上可以说他们更多地依靠阵地进攻。

Leaving the results presented by the team and entering the team's offensive organization process data comparison, we can see a huge gap in the offensive organization of each team.

离开团队呈现的结果并进入团队进攻组织过程数据的比较,我们可以看到每个团队进攻组织的巨大差距。

Although Guangzhou Evergrande also has a high ball possession rate (approximately 56%), it is actually far behind the Premier League duo. Both Liverpool and Manchester City have a ball possession rate of about 60%, of which Manchester City has a ball possession rate as high as 62.6%, which of course has a lot to do with Guardiola's passing style. But Liverpool is not a team pursuing the ultimate pass control, how did they achieve it? The answer is to rely on a lot of fast passes to drive. Judging from the average pass per game, Liverpool averaged 628.2 passes per game, which is much higher than Guangzhou Evergrande. Although from the perspective of Guangzhou Evergrande, since the 2018 season, the average number of passes per game has increased every year, and has increased to 513.5 passes per game in the 2020 season, but there is still a huge gap with the top teams.

尽管广州恒大的控球率也很高(约56%),但实际上远远落后于英超二人组。利物浦和曼城的持球率均约为60%,其中曼城的持球率高达62.6%,这当然与瓜迪奥拉的传球风格息息相关。但是利物浦不是一支追求终极通过控制的球队,他们是如何实现的?答案是依靠大量快速传递来驱动。从场均传球来看,利物浦场均传球628.2次,远高于广州恒大。尽管从广州恒大的角度来看,自2018赛季以来,每场比赛的平均传球次数逐年增加,并在2020赛季增加到每场比赛513.5传球,但与顶级球队的差距仍然很大。

Regardless of Liverpool or Manchester City, the high number of passes per game is not entirely based on possession of the ball. According to the data of the number of passes per minute converted from the actual possession time, the number of passes per minute for Liverpool and Manchester City is 11.71 and 12.30 respectively. The data of Guangzhou Evergrande is less than 10 times-although the past three quarters have continued to improve.

无论利物浦或曼城,每场比赛的高传球次数都不完全是基于控球的能力。根据从实际拥有时间算起的每分钟通过次数的数据,利物浦和曼彻斯特城的每分钟通过次数分别为11.71和12.30。尽管过去三个季度持续改善,但广州恒大的数据还不到10倍。

From the perspective of key passes per game and key passes per minute, Guangzhou Evergrande is absolutely behind in the number of passes per game, and the team's pass organization ability shows similar effects to the Premier League duo. This, of course, has to take into account the differences between the Chinese Super League and the Premier League opponents, or to thank the peers for the foil (after all, Guangzhou Evergrande has already ranked among the best in the Chinese Super League with more than 500 passes per game). From the perspective of Guangzhou Evergrande itself, the decline in key passing data also reflects to a large extent the decline in the organizational ability of Guangzhou Evergrande midfielder this season, which should be taken seriously.

从每场比赛的关键传球数和每分钟关键传球数的角度来看,广州恒大绝对落后于每场比赛的传球次数,而球队的传球组织能力也显示出与英超二重奏相似的效果。当然,这必须考虑到中超联赛和英超联赛对手之间的差异,或者要感谢同行们的挫败感(毕竟,广州恒大已经在中超联赛中名列前茅,而更多超过500个通行证)。从广州恒大本身的角度来看,关键传球数据的下降在很大程度上也反映了本赛季广州恒大中场组织能力的下降,这一点值得我们认真对待。

From the perspective of the proportion of long and short passes and passing accuracy, Guangzhou Evergrande’s short pass is roughly the same as the Premier League duo. In the 2020 season, the proportion of short passes and passing accuracy has been equal to Liverpool. There is still a big gap compared with Manchester City, which has a super high proportion of short passes and a great emphasis on passing accuracy. In other words, from the perspective of the number of passes and the type of pass, even the 2018 Evergrande has no similarities with Manchester City.

从长传和短传的比例和传球准确性的角度来看,广州恒大的短传与英超二人组大致相同。在2020赛季,短传和传球的准确率已经和利物浦相当。与曼彻斯特城相比,还有很大的差距,曼彻斯特城的短传率非常高,并且非常重视传球的准确性。换句话说,从通行证数量和通行证类型的角度来看,即使是2018年的恒大也与曼城没有相似之处。

Judging from the data related to the passing, it is easier to see the difference between Guangzhou Evergrande and the Premier League duo. Although both Liverpool and Manchester City do not reject the bottom pass when facing the opponent's intensive defense.

从与传球相关的数据来看,更容易看出广州恒大和英超二人组之间的区别。尽管利物浦和曼城在面对对手的强化防守时都不会拒绝底传。

But this is undoubtedly not their conventional method. About 3.5% of the crosses accounted for almost the same as Guangzhou Evergrande this year. However, in the 2018 season, Guangzhou had 5.5% of crosses. Obviously, it is more dependent on the cross ability of the side. This is directly related to the proportion of shots and goals in the small penalty area mentioned above.

但这无疑不是他们的常规方法。今年约有3.5%的十字架与广州恒大的十字架几乎相同。然而,在2018赛季中,广州的传中率高达5.5%。显然,它更多地取决于侧面的交叉能力。这直接与上述小罚球区的射门和进球比例有关。

Judging from the turnover data, Manchester City has very low touch errors and forced errors, while Liverpool's touch errors are high but forced errors are very low. This is consistent with their attack characteristics mentioned above. . In Guangzhou Evergrande, the combined attack in the 2018 season was very decisive and proactive. In the following two years, the initiative and oppressiveness of the offense were getting lower and lower. The forced errors in the 2020 season showed the team's performance. The ball-holding and organizing ability in the face of the press has dropped significantly (for example, the first round of this season against Shandong Luneng's game is clearly exposed: "[Guangzhou Evergrande 0:1 Shandong Luneng] Tonight's Evergrande match Not on Wei Shihao"), which is basically consistent with the decline in midfield organization mentioned above.

从营业额数据来看,曼彻斯特城的接触错误和强迫错误非常低,而利物浦的接触错误很高,但强迫错误非常低。这与它们上面提到的攻击特征是一致的。 。在广州恒大,2018赛季的联合进攻非常果断且积极主动。在随后的两年中,这种犯罪的主动性和压迫性越来越低。 2020赛季的强迫失误表明了球队的表现。面对媒体的持球和组织能力已经大大下降(例如,本赛季对阵山东鲁能的比赛首轮比赛明显暴露出来:“ [[广州恒大0:1山东鲁能]今晚的恒大赛不在魏Shihao”),这基本上与上述中场组织的减少相一致。

It is basically impossible for Guangzhou Evergrande to learn Manchester City. In addition to the huge gap in transmission and control capabilities mentioned above, it is also difficult for Guangzhou Evergrande to learn in terms of personnel composition. Guangzhou Evergrande has no passing masters like De Bruyne and David Silva, and can find the best passing route in a small space to directly penetrate the opponent's defense. (The 90-minute converted SmartPass data of De Bruyne and David Silva occupy the top two positions in the Premier League, and the SmartPass success rate is also among the best)

广州恒大基本上不可能学习曼彻斯特城。除了上述传输和控制能力的巨大差距外,广州恒大在人员组成方面也很难学习。广州恒大没有像德布鲁因和戴维·席尔瓦这样的传球大师,可以在很小的空间中找到最佳传球路线,直接穿透对手的防守。 (De Bruyne和David Silva的90分钟转换后的SmartPass数据在英超联赛中排名前两位,而且SmartPass的成功率也是最高的)

There is also a lack of strikers with strong dribbling breakthrough ability like Sterling/Mahrez. Does Guangzhou Evergrande count on Exon, Yang Liyu or Talisca to break through?

还缺少像斯特林/马赫雷斯这样的运球能力强的前锋。广州恒大会依靠Exon,Yang Liyu或Talisca取得突破吗?

Summary: If Guangzhou Evergrande is somewhat similar to the top teams from the perspective of offensive and defensive effects, then at the level of offensive organization, there is a big gap with the top teams. Guangzhou Evergrande does not have the passing gene and infiltrating passing talents like Manchester City. It also has a big gap with Liverpool in terms of speed (passing speed), offensive aggression and ability to resist pressing in the backcourt. However, considering the gap in personnel composition, it is almost impossible to learn from Manchester City in general, while it is still possible to learn from Liverpool. Moreover, the key point for the improvement of the offensive organization perspective is in the midfield. General running, pass and cut speed, these are never as unattainable as expecting a talented midfielder.

简介:如果从进攻和防守效果的角度来看,广州恒大与顶级球队有些相似,那么在进攻组织层面上,恒大与顶级球队之间存在很大差距。广州恒大没有像曼彻斯特这样的传球基因和渗透传球人才。与利物浦在速度(传球速度),进攻进攻性和抵抗后场防守能力上也有很大差距。但是,考虑到人员构成的差距,一般来说,几乎不可能向曼城学习,而仍然可以向利物浦学习。而且,改进进攻组织观点的关键是在中场。一般的跑步,传球和切速,这些都是从未有过的有才华的中场球员所无法企及的。

If the gap in offensive organization ability is obvious, can Guangzhou Evergrande show considerable ability in defensive ability? The answer may also be pessimistic.

如果进攻组织能力差距明显,广州恒大能否表现出相当的防守能力?答案也可能是悲观的。

Whether it is tackles per game (Tackles) or intercepts per game (Interceptions), Guangzhou Evergrande is far behind the Premier League duo. These defensive actions are generally made by players in the midfield and frontcourt, or closer to the index of the team's defense, tackles and interceptions generally occur less in their own 30-meter core defensive area, and more In the midfield or on the wing.

无论是每场铲球(铲球)还是每场拦截球(拦截),广州恒大都远超英超二人组。这些防守行动通常由中场和前场的球员做出,或更接近球队的防守指标,抢断和拦截通常发生在他们自己的30米核心防守区域,而在中场或边路则更多。

One result of the difference in the team's defensive ability in the midfield and frontcourt is that Guangzhou Evergrande's ShotBlocked and Clearances data are far greater than the Premier League duo. In other words, in the data of the last line of defense before the goalkeeper was blocked/cleared by the back line, Guangzhou Evergrande was under greater pressure, so there were more fouls in comparison.

球队在中场和前场的防守能力差异的一个结果是,广州恒大的ShotBlocked和Clearances数据远大于英超二人组。换句话说,在守门员被后门阻挡/清除之前最后一道防线的数据中,广州恒大承受的压力更大,因此相比之下犯规次数更多。

In terms of pass blocking and pass blocking, in general, everyone's data is basically similar. As the more capable of controlling the ball, Manchester City is亚搏官网app登录 less likely to let opponents siege themselves.

就通行阻止和通行阻止而言,通常来说,每个人的数据基本上都是相似的。由于控制球的能力更强,曼城不太可能让对手围攻自己。

In other words, from a purely defensive point of view, the gap between Guangzhou Evergrande's overall defensive ability and defender's defensive ability and the Premier League duo is huge. This, of course, has to take into account the very deformed foreign aid structure of the Chinese Super League. Almost all Chinese Super League teams are equipped with foreign attack lines and use local defense lines, so that the Chinese Super League defense lines have to face foreign attack lines, which naturally leads to a balance of offense and defense. There is a big imbalance. From another point of view, the foreign attack line often takes on most of the team's attacking tasks, and there are many teams where the head coach does not require him to participate in the team's defense, even in Guangzhou Evergrande. Although the coach Cannavaro has repeatedly emphasized that everyone needs to participate in defense, we can obviously see that the defensive participation of Talisca and Fernando is insufficient, and even Paulinho has repeatedly praised this season. Going to the center position and u亚搏官网app登录nable to return to defense in time.

换句话说,从纯粹的防守角度来看,广州恒大的总体防守能力和后卫的防守能力与英超二人组之间的差距是巨大的。当然,这必须考虑到中国超级联赛非常畸形的外援结构。几乎所有中国超级联赛球队都配备了外国攻击线并使用本地防御线,因此中国超级联赛的防御线不得不面对外国攻击线,这自然会导致攻守平衡。存在很大的失衡。从另一角度看,外国进攻线通常承担着球队大部分的进攻任务,而且在很多球队中,总教练甚至在广州恒大都不要求他参加球队的防守。尽管教练卡纳瓦罗一再强调每个人都需要参加防守,但我们显然可以看到塔里斯卡和费尔南多的防守参与不足,甚至鲍里尼奥也屡屡赞扬本赛季。转到中间位置,无法及时返回防守。

From this point of view, if Guangzhou Evergrande hopes to move forward in the direction of Liverpool, then it needs to improve its defensive ability, especially the defensive ability of the whole team. In the 2019 season, Guangzhou Evergrande built the depth of defense by shrinking the line of defense and compressing the defensive space. This can certainly improve the effectiveness of the team's defense to a certain extent, but at the expense of offensive oppression. If Guangzhou Evergrande's expectation is to win the Super League championship, then this strategy of shrinking defense is undoubtedly appropriate. But if Guangzhou Evergrande has a more ambitious goal—for example, to become a top team in the world—then it is in line with the development direction of world football to increase the offensive pressure while improving the overall defensive ability, and this is for the team’s sports Ability and vitality are also a great test.

从这个角度来看,如果广州恒大希望朝着利物浦的方向前进,那就需要提高其防守能力,尤其是整个球队的防守能力。在2019赛季,广州恒大通过缩小防守线并压缩防守空间来建立防守深度。当然可以在一定程度上提高球队防守的效率,但要以进攻压迫为代价。如果广州恒大的期望是赢得超级联赛冠军,那么这种缩小防守的策略无疑是适当的。但是,如果广州恒大的雄心勃勃的目标(例如成为世界一流的球队),那么在提高整体防守能力的同时增加进攻压力,这符合世界足球的发展方向,这是为了球队的运动能力和活力也是一个很好的考验。

Combined with the above data comparison, we can probably draw the following conclusions:

结合以上数据比较,我们可能得出以下结论:

1. Regardless of offensive organization or defensive organization, Guangzhou Evergrande is far from the Premier League duo. On the offensive end, the most important thing is to speed up the pass and counterattack, while on the defensive end, focus on improving the defensive ability of the team.

1.无论进攻组织还是防守组织,广州恒大都离英超二人组很远。在进攻端,最重要的是加快传球和反击的速度,而在防守端,则要着重提高球队的防守能力。

2. Based on the analysis of the actual situation, it is more appropriate for Guangzhou Evergrande to develop in the direction of Liverpool in the 2019 season. The shortcomings of the current midfielder are more obvious, whether in running ability, forward passing ability, and back insertion. Ability, as well as the midfield defensive interception ability has a lot of room for improvement.

2.根据实际情况分析,广州恒大在2019赛季朝着利物浦方向发展比较合适。当前中场的缺点在奔跑能力,前传能力和后仰插入方面更加明显。该能力以及中场的防守拦截能力都有很大的提高空间。

3. Guangzhou Evergrande's counterattack ability is worrying this season, it needs attention.

3.本赛季广州恒大的反击能力令人担忧,需要引起注意。

4. This season, Guangzhou Evergrande’s more shots from outside the penalty area did not bring better results. The team should face up to the 亚搏官网app登录current huge problem of offensive sharpness. If it cannot introduce new aid from top passers, then learn It is a good way for Liverpool to speed up the pass and get more of the midfield line into the penalty area.

4.本赛季,广州恒大在禁区外的射门次数没有增加。球队应该正视当前进攻锋利的巨大问题。如果它不能从顶级传球手那里引进新的助攻,那么请学习这是利物浦加快传球速度并将更多中场线带入禁区的好方法。

5. The ability to resist pressure and organize in the midfield needs to be improved.

5.需要提高抵抗压力和中场组织能力。

6. In the case of a lack of organizational ability in the middle, it is also a good option to continue to use the side/ribs to combine the offense.

6.在中间缺乏组织能力的情况下,继续使用边/肋骨组合进攻也是一个不错的选择。

In short, it is not so much that Guangzhou Evergrande and which team is more similar, it is better to say that from some basic capabilities, Guangzhou Evergrande is still far from the world's top teams. And these gaps are really implemented, that is, the most basic running, passing, inserting awareness, covering ability, on-the-spot defense awareness, etc. in the football world. It is not how deep it is, but it is really necessary to improve it. It is a long way to go.

简而言之,广州恒大和哪个团队更相似,不应该说广州恒大在一些基本能力上还与世界顶级球队相去甚远。这些差距是真正实现的,即足球世界中最基本的跑步,传球,插入意识,覆盖能力,现场防守意识等。它不是很深,但是确实有必要进行改进。这是很长的路要走。

Welcome to forward, like, and watch Sanlian. Also welcome everyone to pay attention to the official account.

欢迎前进,喜欢,并观看三联。也欢迎大家关注官方账号。

Copyright © 2016 All Rights Reserved 版权所有· 亚搏体育app网页—亚搏官网app登录